Friday 30 March 2018

The Golden Generation



The Golden Generation

          We're now rapidly approaching this summer's World Cup Finals in Russia, assuming it doesn't all get called off due to WW3 (with Russia starring as the 'baddies'), and 12 years have passed since England's golden generation rocked up in Germany, again failing to impress before Rooney stamped on someone, got sent off and we crashed out on penalties (again...). But let's see how the current generation, which I'm going to shoehorn into a 4-4-2, compares to the golden generation.
Here's the bench mark...



This would be my England side, crammed into a 4-4-2.

Goalkeeper. Jack Butland vs Paul Robinson
          Neither of these goalies fill be with confidence as an England supporter but this is what we're all stuck with. How on earth Paul Robinson is listed as being part of 'the golden generation' is beyond me. Although he never really established himself other than his involvement in the 20006 World Cup. His mistake in Euro 2008 qualifying against Croatia lost him his place in the England set-up, and to my knowledge he never returned.
          Butland on the other hand has never had the chance to have a shocker in an England shirt. The Stoke number one has been second fiddle to Joe Hart for a while now, and now Hart is considered 'past it' Butland has competition from Pickford for the number one shirt. A good World Cup for either could see them go on to be the undisputed number one for sometime.
          In his time, Robinson was fairly uninspiring and never set the world alight, Butland is likely to be the same but his shotstopping and ability to come for crosses is exemplary.

Right Back. Kyle Walker vs Gary Neville
          It's hard to call this one. The position of fullback has changed so much in the last decade. Given the choice of prime Neville and prime Walker, I'd go for the Man United legend all day. Neville is the epitome of solid defenders and the best wingers always struggle against him.
         Walker has recently proven his worth in two additional positions, as a centre-back for \England, and a Wingback for his clubs. The role allowed us to see Walker's ability to fire a diagonal ball into the channels with ease. An impressive trait to have. As a fullback or wingback, his pace does him brilliantly, getting up and down the flank to cross on the overlap.
          Unfortunately for the man from Sheffield, Gary Neville isn't so easy to be better than, as his 89 England caps shows all of his rivals. Can you name another England right back from that era? I definitely can't.

Left Back. Danny Rose vs Ashley Cole
          Although almost every English person hates Cole for what he did to his ex wife Cheryl, the nations sweetheart, it is hard to deny that during his career Cole was easily the best Left Back in the world. The man with 100+ England caps even managed to get this many caps despite competition from other top left backs, such as Wayne Bridge. Cole was similar to how Kyle Walker and Danny Rose play in the modern era, arguably one of the pioneers of the Wingback role. He regressed slightly in his later years, but who doesn't?
          As stated previously, Danny Rose is very similar to Ashley Cole. The Yorkshireman is hard done by that he is up against other strong leftbacks in Bertrand, Shaw and Young. If he were to establish himself in the coming years he could be seen in the same light we now see Cole. But as he is getting ever closer to 30 he needs to hurry up and establish himself.
Finished: Ashley Cole, who has 107 England caps, has retired from international football
Cole amassed 107 caps for England before retirement.
Centre Back. Stones and Cahill vs Terry and Ferdinand
          This is a difficult one to call really. Cahill was a late bloomer but he and Terry are more or less the same player. I think I'd take Cahill just because he's less of a shithouse... Ya know, we don't hear about Cahill sleeping with his teamates partners or being racist do we?
          Stones and Ferdinand are again very similar, both top ball players and good defenders. Ferdinand edges this one because he was an all time colossus for England and Man United. Give young stones a few more years to develop and he'll challenge Ferdinand even further and potentially surpass him.
         As a pair you can't look past Terry and Ferdinand, a top pairing. That was until Terry was accused of being racist by Ferdinand's brother... Mind you, they've both had a chequered past. What with Ferdinand missing a drugs test and being banned for a while.

Right Wing. Raheem Sterling vs David Beckham
          No contest here at all. Becks comes out top. When Sterling carries his nation to a World Cup on his own then we'll talk. I'm having none of it.
          Becks could it all, he was the best crosser of the ball England has ever seen, his set pieces were a work of art and his leadership set him atop of all the players of this generation. The consummate pro, that was until he got himself sent of against Argentina at France 98. We'll forgive him of that though.
          Sterling is in his mid twenties now and is only just maturing into a decent player. It's not really good enough. He has never performed for England either. I've said it time and time again, he's not that good. Now he's got a top coach at Club level we have seen an improvement. But he's been no better than Andros Townsend and Wilf Zaha in recent seasons. What's the fuss?
Iconic: David Beckham scored this free kick against Greece in 2001 to help England reach the World Cup
The man that was everyone's crush, even more so when he did this/

Left Wing. Adam Lallana vs Joe Cole
          I've put these two both on the left wing because that' where they'd be shoe-horned into this side. Cole frequently played on the left of midfield for England, fitting around the strength of England's Central players, Lallana usually has the same problem.
          I'd argue that Lallana brings more to the table that Joe Cole does. Although in their prime they were both extraordinary players, Cole Struggled once leaving Chelsea, and Lallana is also on the decline. Both players have been plagued by injuries throughout their careers and that has definitely hampered their careers.
          I think I'd rather have Lallana in my side because of his abilities on the ball and the fact he can also be a top central player if needs be. Cole is much more attacking minded, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, just what i'm using to justify my selection.

Centre Mid. Eric Dier and Dele Alli vs Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard.
          The two best all round central midfielders England has ever produced. Both could play in a deep lying role, making the play, scoring the goals and winning possession back from the opposition. They're both very good players, but they never managed to make it work together. On the other hand, Dier and Alli seem to gel as a pair. One sits back and dominates the deeper areas of play with crunching challenges and raking diagonal balls, the other can operate just off the striker in a shadow role, and create moves from there. Always able to beat a man, Alli is another top player. As  pair i'd rather have Dier and Alli because they can actually work together.
          As all round players though, Lampard is probably easiest to compare to Alli, as the goalscorer. Lamps is the Premier League's all time top scoring midfielder, Alli has some work to do on that front. Lamps scored a lot of goals for Chelsea but never really scored for the three lions. Alli is yet to start scoring for England on a regular basis as well, so who turns into the better midfielder is still up in the air.
          Gerrard was my hero growing up. He could do it all, but Dier matches him in almost all areas. Both take a good freekick, both are good leaders, both are not scared to put their bodies on the line for their teams, both are solid defensively but the one thing that drags Gerrard clear as the better player is that he gets right up there and scores a few off his own back. Gerrard is the main man.

Strikers. Marcus Rashford and Harry Kane vs Wayne Rooney and Michael Owen
          This is a simple one for me. Rashford isn't ready to be compared to England's top goalscorer ever. Not quite yet anyway... Kane is by far and away better than Michael Owen. Owen relied on his pace, Kane has everything in his locker.
          Rashford, all being well will be up there when he's older, provided he plays in the correct club position, rather than out on the wing. To do that, he may have to leave Man United...
          Kane needs to stay in England, if he goes off to Real Madrid and plays second fiddle to Cristiano Ronaldo his development will only be hindered. He needs to stay fit and keep scoring and he'll probably be up there with the World's greatest Forwards.
Image result for harry kane england
Kane, England's current top boy.

That'll do for this post. It's a bit of a ramble really, probably shite, As ever please feel free to share and comment.

Until Next Time.

Craig

Friday 23 March 2018

"Sack the Board."





          The other day West Ham supports staged a protest at the ownership of their club by Davids Gold, and Sullivan. Supporters stopped the game three times with pitch invasions and then supporters congregated beneath the directors box, screaming abuse and the adult industry mogels that run their club. Unhappy at leaving their spiritual home, moving to a bigger stadium with no atmosphere and continuing with yet more mediocrity and then appointing David Moyes as manager. Supporters want change and they deserve it.
          Forest had similar issues last year. Protesting at the Al Hasawi family's ownership of the club. supporters were unhappy with the repeated sacking of managers, unpaid bills giving Forest a bad name and the downward spiral that came every season as our final position was lower year on year. That all ended this summer, with the takeover by Greek shipping magnate Evangelos Maranakis, and it came in the nick of time. Under Hasawi, the trend in league finishing positions would have seen Forest relegated.
          These clubs aren't exactly anomalies either. Clubs have been mismanaged for years from 1990's Doncaster, through to pleasant day Coventry and Blackburn. All of which, you'll read about below.
Image result for money bags
Owners are usually only in football for their own game these days.
          Coventry City are the first club on the agenda. The current owners, Sisu Capital, took over in December 2007, saving the cub from administration and a points deduction whilst still in the Championship. At the time there was much local optimism, but this would prove to be short lived. After almost ten years under the control of Sisu Capital, Coventry City face almost certain relegation to League Two. Let's not forget that this team won the FA Cup in 1987, and were in the top flight of English football from 1967 to 2001. As of yet they have no deal arranged for them to play at the Ricoh Arena after the end of this season. Their training ground is at risk of being sold off to have houses built on it and they are also contemplating the closure of their academy in June. The peak of resent towards Sisu came when Coventry were evicted from the Ricoh Arena, and had to Groundshare with Northampton Town, approximately 35 miles from Coventry, at the Sixfields Stadium. They currently sit bottom of League One, 14 points from safety.
Sisu Capital, the secretive Mayfair hedge fund run by Joy Seppela, has posted results that are in a similar league to those of the Championship football club it owns.
A mostly empty stadium, this is becoming the norm for the Sky Blues.
          In 2010, the Venky family bought Blackburn Rovers from the Jack Walker Trust. The Indian Chicken magnates took on debts of between £10m-£20m. That figure is now up to over £100m. The managerial revolving door has been going for 8 years now, all starting with the dismissal of Sam Allardyce in 2010. Other managers include Henning Berg who lasted 57 days, and Michael Appleton who lasted the comparatively long 67 days. Attendances at Ewood park continue to dwindle and if there has been any improvement of late it is almost definitely to do with the fact they are in the promotion hunt, albeit following their relegation at the end of last season. The recurring theme in recent years has been the sale of the best players at the club, leaving supporters dismayed. Meanwhile the silence from the boardroom is deafening.
          Now, onto my favourite story in this list. I first heard about the goings on at Doncaster Rovers under Ken Richardson from 1992-1998 in a 'Banter Era' thread on Twitter and it's almost unbelievable what happened. I suggest you read it for yourself (link at the bottom.) Richardson took over the club in 1993, having previously ran non-league Bridlington Town, who he actually bankrupted. His first madness was listing the clubs Belle Vue Stadium as  'For Sale' in national broadsheet papers, despite not owing the ground. The council, who did own the ground, were not impresses. In 1995 one of the stands caught fire, it was arson, but who was behind it? The first game of the 1996-97 season began with Sammy Chung arriving, only to be told an hour before kick off that he was no longer the Doncaster manager. Summer 1997 was just as mad, rather than building on the successes of the previous season they sold their four best players. Not only that, Doncaster had planned to put the Borough Crest on the shirt, they had 2,000 made without seeking permission. The council refused, still annoyed at Richardson trying to sell the ground and the shirts were wasted. The club were in a mess. shipping 13 goals in their first two home league games, Manager Kerry Dixon left due to being unhappy at Richardson's influence on teams selections. Most owners would deny this, not Richardson, who took caretaker charge and lost again. I honestly urge you to go and read this thread. It's so bad at points you'll laugh.
https://twitter.com/vivarovers/status/968267589611851776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.planetfootball.com%2Fquick-reads%2Fseven-best-banter-era-twitter-threads-everton-west-ham%2F&tfw_creator=planetfutebol&tfw_site=planetfutebol
Image result for Ken richardson doncaster
Doncaster were a sorry mess in the 1990's

          I feel like i'm only scratching the surface here. I'm yet to talk about the Munto Finance mess at Notts County, the Oyston Family and Blackpool, and everything that went off at Portsmouth that lead to the numerous relegation's. At some point there will be a part two of this.

That's all for now though,

Cheers

Craig


Wednesday 14 March 2018

Jose Mourinho - Why Always Him?





          This week Jose Mourinho has made his way into the headlines yet again. Starting off with his negative football style managing to scrape three points against Liverpool, falling out with yet another manager, and then crashing out of the UEFA Champions League by trying to play the same negative football style. For a long time now, I have greatly disliked the man, who in my opinion isn't as good a coach as some might have you believe.
Image result for jose mourinho barca
Mourinho, pictured with his mentor, Sir Bobby Robson and the original Ronaldo.
          Ok, I admit that he did well at Porto. Winning what he did with so little in funds was a fantastic achievement but the natural talent already in that squad will have helped him no end. Here's where the trouble starts though as far as I'm concerned.
          At Chelsea, he walked into a club that he admitted he wasn;t that interested in managing, only taking the job when Liverpool appointed Rafa Benitez over him. In his first transfer window. in 2004, he spent £70 million on players to add to his squad. Over half of that sum was spent between two players (Didier Drogba and Michael Essien). In his first spell at Chelsea he won six trophies in three seasons. This includes two Premier League titles.
Image result for drogba signs for chelsea
Drogaba and Kezman, two of Mourinho's signing lift the League Cup together.
          The Mourinho we saw at Inter Milan is my personal favourite. He promoted youth, extended the career of Luis Figo and didn't break the bank. He was a success in Italy as a coach, not for buying the best players in every position as he could do at Chelsea and a t future clubs. What let him down, is still letting him down today. he runs his mouth far too much. he fell out with no fewer than 6 managers during his spell as Internationale manager, including Ranieri and Lippi. Hi time in Milan came to an end in 2010 on a positive though, becoming the first side to win the treble, winning his second Champions League in the process with a 2-0 win over Bayern Munich.
          The Portuguese time at Madrid was mixed. But it's hard to argue against any of the trophies he did win being helped massively by just buying whoever he needed to fill a gap. He also showed off his now common place shit-housery. Fighting during El Classico's, inlcuding poking Tito Villanova in the eye, accusing referees of bias towards Barcelona, and frequent fallings out with club legends such as Sergio Ramos, Cristiano Ronaldo and Iker Casillas, who was dropped by Mourinho much to the distaste of the Madrid supporters.
Image result for jose mourinho real madrid
During his time at Madrid, Jose spent a lot of time with footballs second best player.
            Upon Mourinho's Chelsea return he did it again. He bought expensive players that would provide instant results rather than trying to be tactical and coach his players how Conte would later do at Chelsea. He won the league cup and then won the league itself later that year in the only two trophies during his second tenure at the Blues.
            Following his sacking from Chelsea, He moved to Manchester United the following summer. He spent big money yet again, on Pogba and Bailly to name a few. In his first season he was a perceived success, winning three trophies. Those were the Charity Shield, the League Cup and The Europa League. So, he won a game that is considered a pre-season friendly, England's second rate competition and Europe's second rate competition. I call this perceived success because although it was a treble, they finished sixth in the premier league and only made it into the Champions League due to win the Europa League.
Image result for jose mourinho treble
Manchester United celebrate completing the treble, Mourinho is front and centre. As usual.
          I'm not denying that Mourinho has been successful. My only issue is the way that he has gone about it. He just always seems to buy his success. Signing expensive players andnot having much interest in youth development."

"Why play Rashford the young English talented striker, when I can spend £75m on Lukaku and Rashford can play on the wing. Oh wait, I'll sign Sanchez for the wing and bomb Rashford Completely."

          His negative tactics make football look boring, and at a club like Manchester United, parking the bus was unheard of. What kind of supporter likes to watch his/her team sit back and not attempt to score? It makes it even better when they let themselves down, like they  did last night against Sevilla.
          The last thing that really annoys me is the fact he spends more time talking to the press than any other manager. Only this week he criticised Frank De Boer in the press, calling him the worst manager in Premier League history. he said this because De Boer criticised his negative tactics whilst doing some punditry.He does this frequently, as noted above. Someone will do something, be it make a comment on TV or to a Newspaper and all of a sudden Mourinho makes it into an argument. It's pathetic and unnecessary.

Rant over. 

Until next time though.

Craig.

Thursday 8 March 2018

Time of Change








          Over the last few weeks the fortunes at Nottingham Forest have turned. Unbeaten in their last five, they head into a game at home to local rivals Derby County on Sunday. The signings made by Aitor Karanka in January have really started to gel and are making a difference. That, and the departure of dead wood, such as Matt Mills, Armand Traore and Jamie Ward through various channels has seen a strong squad emerge. Cardiff City agreed a swap deal with Forest on deadline day, seeing Lee Tomlin and Jamie Ward swap clubs until the end of the season, and this has seemed like crucial business for Forest so far...

          Before signing for Forest on loan, Lee Tomlin was having an unremarkable season. He signed for Cardiff in the summer window, made thirteen appearances, scoring one goal, up until deadline day when he moved Trentside. since then he has scored three goals and assisted two in 5 appearances for the club. This has come out of nowhere though, upon inspection his stats are unremarkable. So what does this mean? Is Karanka instilling deep rooted confidence in his players to trust there ability? Who knows? All I can tell you is that it's working.
Related image
Tomlin celebrates his first Forest goal.

          Joe Lolley has had a similar impact on the club, making five appearances since signing and already scoring twice and assisting another two. The younger winger, who signed a four and a half year deal with Forest in January began his career in non-league and he can be considered as one of the success stories from non-league football. Across 4 years he has made ninety appearances for Huddersfield and he looks to be a fantastic signing.
Image result for Joe Lolley
Joe Lolley and Ben Osborn celebrate Lolley's second goal for Forest.

          Not only has Karanka signed good players. He is also utilising those we already had in a better manner. Ben Brereton is scoring goals, as is Matty Cash. Jordan Smith is being protected from criticism and has some experienced goalkeepers around him to learn from. Joe Worrall is being rested and allowed time to recover, rather than playing every game as our only decent centreback. Ben Osborn is also playing out of his skin, as one of Forest's most consistent players over the recent seasons.
          The changes made at Forest stand the reds in good stead for the remainder of the season and looking forward to next season, if Karanka gets rid of more of the deadwood, and then brings in the right players to replace them, then I don't see why we can't make the play-offs.

Until next time.

Craig

Thursday 1 March 2018

If I were FIFA President...



If I were FIFA President...

          After years of mismanagement at Football's top level we have a new man at the helm. Things don't seem to have changed though, the wholesale changes expected have not happened, although we are seeing the introduction of technology in football. Image result for fifa
       
If I were the FIFA President though, this is what I would do:

Enforced Release Clauses.
          The first thing I would do would be to give football some more credibility. FIFA would set the value of every player, based on his form, worth to his current club and potential ability. In the same vein as fantasy football values, the price fluctuates throughout a season. A maximum value can be set worldwide of £30 million pounds. In this system Lionel Messi would be worth £30 million and if an offer came in for him at that amount it must be accepted. Then the only way he can made to stay at Barcelona is if they offer him an improved deal that he is happy with. If, come January, he's been playing out of his skin, then his value could fluctuate up to £35 million.
          In short, the value of a player is set by FIFA and if an offer of that amount comes in then the offer must be accepted. So, what is to stop the top teams from pooling the worlds best and pinching players at low fees? Well, all transfers must be approved by FIFA and there should be a maximum of five transfers of players over the age of 23 per season. This will bring the amount of money spent down each summer.
Image result for messi
Lionel Messi, the world's best player, would cost £30m under the rules I propose.
Technology
          In recent years technology has been trialled in football, but it's not quite good enough yet. We should take a leaf out of Rugby's book. When games of rugby go to the video referee everyone in the stadium can see on the big screen what is being looked at. The process should also be quicker. Rather than the referee asking the VAR if anything was wrong, it should be the other way around. The VAR needs to tell the referee if anything is wrong. This can speed the process up immensely.
          Also, in the same vein as rugby, the referee's would have microphones on them that can be heard by those watching on the telly and those who have an earpiece you can buy from the games, as in rugby. This clears up any confusion as to what is actually happening on the pitch.
Image result for Rugby video ref
Rugby's Video referee will tell the referee when he makes a mistake.
Youth Development
          The final big change I would make, is to enforce clubs to have at least three homegrown players in their match-day squad and one of them must start the game. This will encourage clubs to develop players quicker rather than sending them away on loan year after year such as clubs like Chelsea, Arsenal, and both Manchester clubs. This in turn, from a purely selfish point of view, could reward clubs such as my team, Forest, for their commitment to the youth programmes.

That's all for this week sports fans, I've been awfully busy what with the weather conditions and work.

We go again next week.

Craig

Nothing Changes, Just The Names And The Faces (Part Three)

          Here we are again. A familiar situation to Forest fans who, since I've been watching Forest have been under new management...